• >
  • >
  • >
  • >
  • >

Overview & Analysis

The Measures for Labeling AI-Generated Synthetic Content establish China's dedicated regulatory framework for identifying and disclosing AI-generated material — covering text, images, audio, video, and virtual scenarios. The Measures require all qualifying network information service providers to apply both explicit labeling (visible or audible indicators that users can perceive directly) and implicit labeling (technical markers embedded in file metadata, including digital watermarks). The two labeling types work in tandem: explicit labels serve users who consume content, while implicit labels serve platforms and regulators that process or distribute it. The framework sits at the intersection of the Provisions on Deep Synthesis, the Algorithmic Recommendation Measures, and the Interim Measures for Generative AI Services — consolidating labeling obligations that were previously scattered across those instruments into a single, detailed operational standard.

This regulation is particularly important in the context of AI applications as generative AI technology is increasingly prevalent across news, advertising, entertainment, and education. To avoid misleading the public, maintain information transparency, and prevent the spread of false information, all service providers involved in generating content must comply with the labeling requirements. For AI projects, clearly labeling the source of generated content not only improves the platform's credibility but also strengthens user accountability and prevents the misuse of AI technologies. The Measures also impose obligations on content dissemination platforms — not just generators — making them a shared-responsibility framework across the AI content supply chain. Notably, users themselves are required to proactively declare and apply labels when publishing generated content, and deliberate deletion, alteration, forgery, or concealment of labels is explicitly prohibited.

Two Labeling Types — How They Work Together

Explicit Labeling (显式标识)

Visible or audible labels that users can directly perceive — required by service providers and declared by users.

  • Text: textual prompts or symbols at start, end, or inline
  • Audio: voice prompts or audio rhythm indicators
  • Images: prominent indicators at appropriate positions
  • Video: indicators in opening frame and around playback
  • Virtual scenarios: indicators in initial frame
  • Must be retained when downloaded, copied, or exported

Implicit Labeling (隐式标识)

Technical markers embedded in file metadata — not easily perceived by users but detectable by platforms and regulators.

  • Mandatory: embedded in file metadata (Article 5)
  • Encouraged: digital watermarks in content data
  • Must include: content attributes, provider name/code, content ID
  • Dissemination platforms check metadata to determine label obligation
  • Platforms add dissemination chain info when forwarding labeled content

Relevant AI Scenarios

This policy applies to all scenarios involving AI-generated synthetic content — text, images, audio, video, and virtual scenarios. Both service providers that generate content and platforms that disseminate it carry labeling obligations. Users who publish generated content must also proactively declare and label it.

1. AI-Generated News, Advertising & Creative Content

When AI generates news reports, advertisements, or creative content, the generated content must be clearly labeled to avoid misleading the public. Explicit labels indicating AI origin are required at specified positions — the beginning, end, or appropriate locations within text; the opening frame and around playback for video. This labeling allows users to immediately identify the content's source and ensures informed consumption of AI-generated material.

2. AI-Generated Content on Social Media & Online Platforms

On social media, video platforms, and interactive online platforms, AI-generated content — such as comments, articles, and virtual character videos — must be clearly labeled. Dissemination platforms carry three-tier obligations: checking metadata for implicit labels, adding prominent indicators where metadata confirms generation, accepting user declarations where metadata is absent, and detecting explicit label traces or other generation signs to flag suspected generated content.

3. Virtual Scenarios and Metaverse Applications

In metaverse and virtual reality applications, AI-generated scenarios and interactive content must be labeled with explicit indicators at the initial frame and, optionally, during the course of the virtual service. These labels ensure users are aware whether the immersive content they are engaging with is AI-generated — particularly important as synthetic virtual environments become increasingly indistinguishable from human-created ones.

4. Content Generation Platforms Offering AI Creation Tools

Service providers offering AI creation tools and platforms must specify labeling methods and standards in user service agreements and prompt users to read and understand labeling requirements. Application distribution platforms must also require app providers to declare whether they offer AI-generated content services during listing reviews and verify labeling materials before apps go live. This creates a pre-market check that applies to the entire app ecosystem.

5. Cross-Border Content Sharing & International AI Services

When AI-generated content involves cross-border data sharing and distribution, service providers need to ensure that content is transparently labeled and that user privacy is protected through appropriate measures. Compliance with labeling requirements must extend across the content distribution chain, including international platforms and partners. Providers must also submit labeling-related materials when completing algorithm filings and security assessments, integrating labeling compliance into the broader AI regulatory process.


Practical Advice for Managers at Multinational Companies

These Measures provide a standardized and transparent framework for labeling AI-generated content in China. For AI project managers, ensuring the legality and transparency of content and complying with Chinese regulations is key to reducing legal risks and enhancing platform trustworthiness.

01

Build Labeling into Content Pipelines by Content Type

The Measures specify different explicit labeling requirements for each content type: text, audio, images, video, and virtual scenarios each have distinct positioning and format rules. Do not apply a one-size-fits-all approach. Map your AI-generated content outputs by type and build type-specific labeling into the generation pipeline — not as a post-processing step but as an integral part of the output module. Ensure that downloaded, copied, or exported files retain the required explicit labels.

02

Implement Metadata Embedding and a Digital Watermarking Program

Implicit labeling in file metadata is mandatory; digital watermarks are explicitly encouraged. For multinationals, this means working with engineering teams to implement metadata tagging that includes content attributes, provider name or code, and content identifier — for every piece of AI-generated content, not just high-profile outputs. A digital watermarking program provides an additional layer that survives format conversions or screenshot circumvention, and supports the platform's ability to detect generation traces even when explicit labels have been removed.

03

Assign Labeling Responsibilities Clearly Across the Content Chain

The Measures impose obligations on generators, dissemination platforms, app stores, and users — not just on the service that generates the content. Multinationals operating across multiple roles (both generating and distributing AI content) must assign clear internal ownership for each obligation. Dissemination platforms must verify metadata and add their own chain information; app stores must verify labeling compliance at listing. Build these into cross-functional governance workflows, not just technical product requirements.

04

Establish Regular Labeling Compliance Reviews and Incident Procedures

As labeling standards evolve — the Measures reference other instruments such as the Deep Synthesis Provisions and Algorithmic Recommendation rules that may impose additional requirements — companies should establish periodic compliance reviews to track regulatory changes and update labeling implementations accordingly. Separately, Article 10's prohibition on malicious deletion, alteration, forgery, or concealment of labels means that companies should also have incident detection and response procedures for labeling tampering — including in user-generated content workflows where third parties may attempt to strip or forge labels.

Through early planning, rigorous implementation of content labeling, and compliance checks across the full AI content supply chain, companies can reduce legal risks while enhancing platform trustworthiness and promoting the healthy development of AI technologies in China. Labeling is not merely a disclosure obligation — it is the foundation of user trust in an era of increasingly convincing synthetic media.


Complete Regulatory Text

Issued March 7, 2025 · Effective September 1, 2025 · Guoxinfaban Tongzi [2025] No. 2  ·  Source: Cyberspace Administration of China

Jointly Issued By (4 Authorities) Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) · Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) · Ministry of Public Security · National Radio and Television Administration
Articles 1–3  —  Purpose, Scope & Definitions
Article 1 — Purpose and Legal Basis
In order to promote the healthy development of artificial intelligence, regulate the labeling of AI-generated synthetic content, protect the lawful rights and interests of citizens, legal persons, and other organizations, and safeguard public interests, these Measures are formulated in accordance with the Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China, the Provisions on the Administration of Internet Information Service Algorithmic Recommendation, the Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet Information Services, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services, and other laws, administrative regulations, and departmental rules.
Article 2 — Scope of Application
These Measures shall apply to network information service providers (hereinafter referred to as "service providers") that conduct labeling activities for AI-generated synthetic content under circumstances specified in the Provisions on the Administration of Internet Information Service Algorithmic Recommendation, the Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet Information Services, and the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services.
Article 3 — Definitions
AI-generated synthetic content refers to information such as text, images, audio, video, and virtual scenarios generated or synthesized using artificial intelligence technologies.

Labeling of AI-generated synthetic content includes explicit labeling and implicit labeling.

"Explicit labeling" refers to labels added to generated content or interaction interfaces that are presented in forms such as text, audio, or graphics and can be clearly perceived by users.

"Implicit labeling" refers to labels embedded in the data of generated content files through technical means that are not easily perceived by users.
Articles 4–5  —  Explicit and Implicit Labeling Requirements
Article 4 — Explicit Labeling Requirements by Content Type
Where the generative synthesis services provided by service providers fall under the circumstances specified in Article 17, Paragraph 1 of the Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet Information Services, explicit labels shall be added to generated content in accordance with the following requirements:

(1) For text: add textual prompts or common symbol indicators at the beginning, end, or appropriate positions within the content, or add prominent indicators in the interaction interface or around the text;

(2) For audio: add voice prompts or audio rhythm indicators at the beginning, end, or appropriate positions, or add prominent indicators in the interaction interface;

(3) For images: add prominent indicators at appropriate positions;

(4) For video: add prominent indicators at appropriate positions in the opening frame and around playback, and optionally at the end or in the middle;

(5) For virtual scenarios: add prominent indicators at appropriate positions in the initial frame and optionally during the service process;

(6) For other generative synthesis service scenarios: add prominent indicators based on application characteristics.

Where service providers offer download, copy, or export functions, they shall ensure that files contain compliant explicit labels.
Article 5 — Implicit Labeling Requirements
Service providers shall, in accordance with Article 16 of the Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet Information Services, add implicit labels in the metadata of generated content files. Such labels shall include attributes of the generated content, the name or code of the service provider, and content identifiers.

Service providers are encouraged to include implicit labels such as digital watermarks in generated content.

"File metadata" refers to descriptive information embedded in the file header using specific encoding formats to record source, attributes, and usage information.
Article 6  —  Labeling Obligations for Content Dissemination Platforms
Article 6 — Three-Tier Dissemination Labeling Obligations
Service providers offering content dissemination services shall take the following measures to regulate the dissemination of generated content:

(1) Confirmed generated content: Verify whether file metadata contains implicit labels; where metadata clearly indicates generated content, add prominent indicators around published content to clearly inform the public that it is AI-generated;

(2) User-declared generated content: Where metadata lacks implicit labels but users declare the content as generated, add prominent indicators to inform the public that the content may be generated;

(3) Suspected generated content: Where metadata lacks implicit labels and users do not declare it, but the provider detects explicit labels or other signs of generation, identify it as suspected generated content and add prominent indicators;

(4) User declaration tools: Provide labeling tools and prompt users to declare whether content includes generated material.

In cases under items (1) to (3), metadata shall include content attributes, platform identifiers, and content identifiers to record dissemination chain information.
Articles 7–9  —  App Platforms, User Agreements & Unlabeled Requests
Article 7 — App Distribution Platform Obligations
Application distribution platforms shall require service providers to declare whether they offer AI-generated content services during listing or launch review. Where such services are provided, platforms shall verify relevant labeling materials before the app goes live.
Article 8 — User Agreement Specifications
Service providers shall specify labeling methods and standards in user service agreements and prompt users to read and understand labeling requirements.
Article 9 — Requests for Content Without Explicit Labels
Where users request content without explicit labels, providers may supply such content after clarifying user obligations and responsibilities through agreements, and shall retain relevant logs — including recipient information — for no less than six months.
Articles 10–14  —  User Obligations, Prohibitions, Liability & Effective Date
Article 10 — User Obligations and Prohibition on Label Manipulation
Users publishing generated content shall proactively declare and use labeling functions provided by service providers.

No organization or individual may maliciously delete, alter, forge, or conceal labels, provide tools for such actions, or use improper labeling methods to harm others' lawful rights.
Article 11 — Compliance with Other Standards
Service providers conducting labeling activities shall also comply with relevant laws, administrative regulations, departmental rules, and mandatory national standards.
Article 12 — Integration with Algorithm Filing and Security Assessments
Service providers shall submit labeling-related materials when completing procedures such as algorithm filing and security assessments, strengthen information sharing, and support efforts to prevent and combat illegal activities.
Article 13 — Enforcement and Penalties
Violations shall be handled by competent authorities including cyberspace, telecommunications, public security, and broadcasting authorities in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
Article 14 — Effective Date
These Measures shall come into force on September 1, 2025.
↑ Back to top

人工智能生成合成内容标识办法
(2025年3月7日印发,自2025年9月1日起施行)
国信办通字〔2025〕2号 来源:中国网信网

联合发布机构(4个) 国家互联网信息办公室 · 工业和信息化部 · 公安部 · 国家广播电视总局
第一条至第三条 — 目的、适用范围与定义
第一条
为了促进人工智能健康发展,规范人工智能生成合成内容标识,保护公民、法人和其他组织合法权益,维护社会公共利益,根据《中华人民共和国网络安全法》、《互联网信息服务算法推荐管理规定》、《互联网信息服务深度合成管理规定》、《生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法》等法律、行政法规和部门规章,制定本办法。
第二条
符合《互联网信息服务算法推荐管理规定》、《互联网信息服务深度合成管理规定》、《生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法》规定情形的网络信息服务提供者(以下简称"服务提供者")开展人工智能生成合成内容标识活动,适用本办法。
第三条
人工智能生成合成内容是指利用人工智能技术生成、合成的文本、图片、音频、视频、虚拟场景等信息。

人工智能生成合成内容标识包括显式标识和隐式标识。

显式标识是指在生成合成内容或者交互场景界面中添加的,以文字、声音、图形等方式呈现并可以被用户明显感知到的标识。

隐式标识是指采取技术措施在生成合成内容文件数据中添加的,不易被用户明显感知到的标识。
第四条至第五条 — 显式标识与隐式标识要求
第四条
服务提供者提供的生成合成服务属于《互联网信息服务深度合成管理规定》第十七条第一款情形的,应当按照下列要求对生成合成内容添加显式标识:

(一)在文本的起始、末尾或者中间适当位置添加文字提示或者通用符号提示等标识,或者在交互场景界面、文字周边添加显著的提示标识;
(二)在音频的起始、末尾或者中间适当位置添加语音提示或者音频节奏提示等标识,或者在交互场景界面中添加显著的提示标识;
(三)在图片的适当位置添加显著的提示标识;
(四)在视频起始画面和视频播放周边的适当位置添加显著的提示标识,可以在视频末尾和中间适当位置添加显著的提示标识;
(五)呈现虚拟场景时,在起始画面的适当位置添加显著的提示标识,可以在虚拟场景持续服务过程中的适当位置添加显著的提示标识;
(六)其他生成合成服务场景根据自身应用特点添加显著的提示标识。

服务提供者提供生成合成内容下载、复制、导出等功能时,应当确保文件中含有满足要求的显式标识。
第五条
服务提供者应当按照《互联网信息服务深度合成管理规定》第十六条的规定,在生成合成内容的文件元数据中添加隐式标识,隐式标识包含生成合成内容属性信息、服务提供者名称或者编码、内容编号等制作要素信息。

鼓励服务提供者在生成合成内容中添加数字水印等形式的隐式标识。

文件元数据是指按照特定编码格式嵌入到文件头部的描述性信息,用于记录文件来源、属性、用途等信息内容。
第六条 — 网络信息内容传播服务提供者的标识义务
第六条
提供网络信息内容传播服务的服务提供者应当采取下列措施,规范生成合成内容传播活动:

(一)核验文件元数据中是否含有隐式标识,文件元数据明确标明为生成合成内容的,采取适当方式在发布内容周边添加显著的提示标识,明确提醒公众该内容属于生成合成内容;
(二)文件元数据中未核验到隐式标识,但用户声明为生成合成内容的,采取适当方式在发布内容周边添加显著的提示标识,提醒公众该内容可能为生成合成内容;
(三)文件元数据中未核验到隐式标识,用户也未声明为生成合成内容,但提供网络信息内容传播服务的服务提供者检测到显式标识或者其他生成合成痕迹的,识别为疑似生成合成内容,采取适当方式在发布内容周边添加显著的提示标识,提醒公众该内容疑似生成合成内容;
(四)提供必要的标识功能,并提醒用户主动声明发布内容中是否包含生成合成内容。

有前款第一项至第三项情形的,应当在文件元数据中添加生成合成内容属性信息、传播平台名称或者编码、内容编号等传播要素信息。
第七条至第九条 — 应用分发平台、用户服务协议与无显式标识请求
第七条
互联网应用程序分发平台在应用程序上架或者上线审核时,应当要求互联网应用程序服务提供者说明是否提供人工智能生成合成服务。互联网应用程序服务提供者提供人工智能生成合成服务的,互联网应用程序分发平台应当核验其生成合成内容标识相关材料。
第八条
服务提供者应当在用户服务协议中明确说明生成合成内容标识的方法、样式等规范内容,并提示用户仔细阅读并理解相关的标识管理要求。
第九条
用户申请服务提供者提供没有添加显式标识的生成合成内容的,服务提供者可以在通过用户协议明确用户的标识义务和使用责任后,提供不含显式标识的生成合成内容,并依法留存提供对象信息等相关日志不少于六个月。
第十条至第十四条 — 用户义务、禁止行为、合规、备案与施行日期
第十条
用户使用网络信息内容传播服务发布生成合成内容的,应当主动声明并使用服务提供者提供的标识功能进行标识。

任何组织和个人不得恶意删除、篡改、伪造、隐匿本办法规定的生成合成内容标识,不得为他人实施上述恶意行为提供工具或者服务,不得通过不正当标识手段损害他人合法权益。
第十一条
服务提供者开展标识活动的,还应当符合相关法律、行政法规、部门规章和强制性国家标准的要求。
第十二条
服务提供者在履行算法备案、安全评估等手续时,应当按照本办法提供生成合成内容标识相关材料,并加强标识信息共享,为防范打击相关违法犯罪活动提供支持和帮助。
第十三条
违反本办法规定的,由网信、电信、公安和广播电视等有关主管部门依据职责,按照有关法律、行政法规、部门规章的规定予以处理。
第十四条
本办法自2025年9月1日起施行。
↑ 返回顶部

Contact us

Let's talk!
* Required
* Required
* Required
* Invalid email address
By submitting this form, you agree that AGP may contact you with insights and marketing messaging.
No thanks, I don't want to receive any marketing emails from AGP.
Submit

Thank you for your message!
We will contact you soon.