国际航空运输协会的风险管理计划
公司规模
Large Corporate
国家
- Worldwide
产品
- RIMS Risk Maturity Model
技术栈
- Risk Management Software
实施规模
- Enterprise-wide Deployment
技术
- 功能应用 - 企业资源规划系统 (ERP)
适用行业
- 航天
适用功能
- 商业运营
用例
- 监管合规监控
服务
- 系统集成
关于客户
国际航空运输协会 (IATA) 是世界上最大的航空公司贸易协会，拥有 240 多个成员，占全球航空运输总量的 84%。IATA 服务和代表整个航空业，促进安全、安保、可靠性和合作。该协会承担着广泛的全球责任，包括制定有关关键航空问题的行业政策。IATA 的使命是代表、领导和服务航空业。其成员包括来自世界各地的主要航空公司，被公认为全球航空业的代言人。
挑战
国际航空运输协会 (IATA) 承担着广泛的全球责任，包括促进航空业的安全、保障、可靠性和合作。为了有效地管理这些责任，IATA 自 2006 年以来制定并完善了其风险管理计划。最初，该计划与 COSO 框架保持一致，但随着 ERM 的内部发展需要更全面的指导，IATA 采用了其他框架，包括 RIMS 风险成熟度模型。然而，挑战在于为风险评估建立坚实的基础，其中包括标准方法、流程以及记录和报告系统。该系统将在整个组织中用于评估和分类风险以实现业务目标。
解决方案
为了管理广泛的全球责任，IATA 制定并完善了其风险管理计划。最初，该计划与 COSO 框架保持一致，后来，IATA 采用了 RIMS 风险成熟度模型来适应 ERM 的内部发展。在 CRM 助理总监 Roy Moseley 的领导下，建立了坚实的风险评估基础。该基础包括标准方法、流程以及记录和报告系统。该系统用于整个组织对实现业务目标的风险进行评估和分类。它还评估现有控制措施的有效性，并确定业务管理所需的任何其他缓解措施。风险管理计划还加强了组织的业务连续性和事件管理流程。通过将这些治理领域相互整合，可以提供额外的洞察力，否则这些洞察力可能会因孤岛而丢失。
运营影响
Case Study missing?
Start adding your own!
Register with your work email and create a new case study profile for your business.
相关案例.
Case Study
Airbus Soars with Wearable Technology
Building an Airbus aircraft involves complex manufacturing processes consisting of thousands of moving parts. Speed and accuracy are critical to business and competitive advantage. Improvements in both would have high impact on Airbus’ bottom line. Airbus wanted to help operators reduce the complexity of assembling cabin seats and decrease the time required to complete this task.
Case Study
Aircraft Predictive Maintenance and Workflow Optimization
First, aircraft manufacturer have trouble monitoring the health of aircraft systems with health prognostics and deliver predictive maintenance insights. Second, aircraft manufacturer wants a solution that can provide an in-context advisory and align job assignments to match technician experience and expertise.
Case Study
Aerospace & Defense Case Study Airbus
For the development of its new wide-body aircraft, Airbus needed to ensure quality and consistency across all internal and external stakeholders. Airbus had many challenges including a very aggressive development schedule and the need to ramp up production quickly to satisfy their delivery commitments. The lack of communication extended design time and introduced errors that drove up costs.
Case Study
Accelerate Production for Spirit AeroSystems
The manufacture and assembly of massive fuselage assemblies and other large structures generates a river of data. In fact, the bill of materials for a single fuselage alone can be millions of rows of data. In-house production processes and testing, as well as other manufacturers and customers created data flows that overwhelmed previous processes and information systems. Spirit’s customer base had grown substantially since their 2005 divestiture from Boeing, resulting in a $41 billion backlog of orders to fill. To address this backlog, meet increased customer demands and minimize additional capital investment, the company needed a way to improve throughput in the existing operational footprint. Spirit had a requirement from customers to increase fuselage production by 30%. To accomplish this goal, Spirit needed real-time information on its value chain and workflow. However, the two terabytes of data being pulled from their SAP ECC was unmanageable and overloaded their business warehouse. It had become time-consuming and difficult to pull aggregate data, disaggregate it for the needed information and then reassemble to create a report. During the 6-8 hours it took to build a report, another work shift (they run three per day) would have already taken place, thus the report content was out-of-date before it was ever delivered. As a result, supervisors often had to rely on manual efforts to provide charts, reports and analysis.
Case Study
Developing Smart Tools for the Airbus Factory
Manufacturing and assembly of aircraft, which involves tens of thousands of steps that must be followed by the operators, and a single mistake in the process could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix, makes the room for error very small.
